Thursday 2 August 2007

Do it right or don't bother

The Electoral Commission's report into the various internet/telephone/advanced voting and electronic counting pilots in the English local government elections has been published and they have concluded that it isn't currently worth the effort.
"we do not see any merit in continuing with small-scale, piecemeal piloting where similar innovations are explored each year without sufficient planning and implementation time, and in the absence of any clear direction, or likelihood of new insights." — Peter Wardle, Electoral Commission chief executive
So the official body for keeping an eye on all things electoral in this country agrees that this set of pilots were rushed, lacked for sound planning and didn't really teach us anything new, especially given that they were the sixth set in seven years.
There were one or two key worries highlighted about security and perception of the possibility for fraud. In Sheffield (the election I was an observer for) the risk management and accreditation document set (RMADS) had no evidence of having been reviewed or approved by the Security Accreditor or indeed having made it beyond the draft stage. There were also concerns that the risk assessment was a standard one for generic web based services and not specifically for an e-voting system.
The lack of observers at the electronic voting count, the sealed envelope nature of the electronic voting, the perceived slight of hand of the electronic votes being added into the totals and the lack of a recount facility were all causes for concern by those involved in the political process and observers alike. It is important to addresses these perceptions even I they are built on a shaky understanding, the concept of a recount for example, given that any system which could give different answers at the end would have to be binned immediately.
"there was insufficient time available to implement and plan the pilots, and the quality assurance and testing was undertaken too late and lacked sufficient depth. The level of implementation and security risk involved was significant and unacceptable." — The Electoral Commission Key issues and conclusions
Other assessments by the Commission are on a very generous basis, the bullet points on encouraging voting and facilitating counting are based on benefits to a very small number of people or by a tiny margin. The really important conclusion that needs to be remembered for when the government are doing their best to ignore this report to go ahead with what they and not the electorate want is this: The pilot scheme had a negligible impact on turnout. There was some controversy in the run up to this set of pilots about how successful previous pilots had been in increasing turnout, so we need to be sure when, in the future, the subject comes up we can point strait at this and tell them they are wrong.
The bottom line of course is that for once a government technology project came in on time, but at a cost. Telephone voting in Sheffield cost £425 for each person and this was after a discount of a third of a million pounds. While this cost would be reduced in a more widespread scheme than this pilot, it does seam an awful lot of money to try out technology that isn't ready yet, doesn't have the support of a good chunk of key stakeholders and reduces the transparency and security of the voting system while making fraud and vote selling easier.
For more information on the electronic voting pilots read the Open Rights Group briefing paper.


Whome1996 said...

Of course, it is not easy to learn so many homework assignments, and for that, I found the paper writing service that does any writing work that makes my university studies easier

casinononaams said...

With the sensitive nature of making payments online, many customers may fear over here data insecurity issues. That is why our developers ensured 100% security to prevent hackers from infiltrating our website. Your safety is our number one priority. We use advanced TLS encryption technology that secures all transactions and communication between clients and writers.

bojo2112jon said...

Good morning! Very interesting topics I have found on this blog, so thanks for sharing useful information like this! I can recommend this blog to all my guys for sure! But who can write an essay for me? If you happen to need writing help, than professional creators of essays at this online writing company will provide you with remarkable essays and other types of tasks. They provide the highest quality services and fair prices. Barely click on their site and it will become your favorite agency in the nearest future.

Goldyy said...

We constantly upgrade this software to make certain it provides the most reliable results. Because of this, as a reputable academic assistance company websites that write essays for you, we guarantee each piece of writing is free of plagiarism against on-line based sources, all sample- or free-paper databases, and all work ever checked by our own software.

Mia Tayler said...

I'm always looking for something new, looking for people who write essays. I asked people I knew, I even read it on the Internet, I could not find it! But as they say the world is not without good people, I found them they are experts in their field. They approach the work very seriously, they do it very quickly and with high quality, you won’t even find fault! In a word, paradise for a student!

Sam Hebasst said...

Instead of risking a low score for choosing to craft the essay in a desultory fashion assignment help , searching for professionals becomes a valid option in ensuring success.